DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jaguar XJ vs 2003 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
JaguarMakeLincoln
XJModelLS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
7,3 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
284 HPPower284 HP
375 NmTorque388 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
81 ltFuel tank68 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
12 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R17Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationLincoln LS
5023 mmLength4925 mm
1799 mmWidth1860 mm
1345 mmHeight1450 mm
1780 KgWeight1710 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jaguar XJ and 2003 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…