DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Jaguar S-type vs 2003 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeLincoln
S-typeModelLS
2002Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h—
242 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
276 HPPower284 HP
378 NmTorque388 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
16 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R16 WTyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4925 mm
1819 mmWidth1860 mm
1441 mmHeight1450 mm
1795 KgWeight1710 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Jaguar S-type and 2003 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…