DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lincoln LS vs 1999 AC Aceca Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

81.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lincoln LSSpecificationAC Aceca
LincolnMakeAC
LSModelAceca
2003Model year1999
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

Lincoln LSSpecificationAC Aceca
—0–100 km/h5,6 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3506 cc
284 HPPower354 HP
388 NmTorque407 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Lincoln LSSpecificationAC Aceca
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank90 lt
16 ltUrban consumption20 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lincoln LSSpecificationAC Aceca
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/50 R17Tyre size255/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lincoln LSSpecificationAC Aceca
4925 mmLength4660 mm
1860 mmWidth1890 mm
1450 mmHeight1340 mm
1710 KgWeight1615 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lincoln LS and 1999 AC Aceca approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…