DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lincoln LS vs 2003 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
LincolnMakeJaguar
LSModelXJ
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
—0–100 km/h7,6 s
230 km/hTop speed242 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3555 cc
284 HPPower258 HP
388 NmTorque335 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank85 lt
16 ltUrban consumption15,9 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/50 R17Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lincoln LSSpecificationJaguar XJ
4925 mmLength5090 mm
1860 mmWidth1860 mm
1450 mmHeight1448 mm
1710 KgWeight1615 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase3034 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lincoln LS and 2003 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…