DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lincoln LS vs 2002 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeJaguar
LSModelS-type
2003Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,1 s
230 km/hTop speed242 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
284 HPPower276 HP
388 NmTorque378 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
16 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R17Tyre size225/55 R16 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4861 mm
1860 mmWidth1819 mm
1450 mmHeight1441 mm
1710 KgWeight1795 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lincoln LS and 2002 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…