DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2016 Ford Tourneo Custom Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tourneo Custom

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range Rover EvoqueModelTourneo Custom
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats8/9
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed157 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
150 HPPower155 HP
400 NmTorque385 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/65 R15; 215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4972 mm
1965 mmWidth1986 mm
1635 mmHeight1827-1984 mm
1700 KgWeight2104 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2933 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2016 Ford Tourneo Custom approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tourneo Custom leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…