2016 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 SKYACTIV-D (175 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
2016 Mazda 6 vs 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Land Rover
Range Rover Evoque
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Range 2.2 TD4 (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
MazdaMakeLand Rover
6ModelRange Rover Evoque
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
7,9 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
223 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2191 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
175 HPPower150 HP
420 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
4870 mmLength4355 mm
1840 mmWidth1965 mm
1450 mmHeight1635 mm
1485-1590 KgWeight1700 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mazda 6 and 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…