2016 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (160 Hp) 2016Overall Score76.5/100
2016 Ford Ranger vs 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Land Rover
Range Rover Evoque
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Range 2.2 TD4 (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
76.5–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
FordMakeLand Rover
RangerModelRange Rover Evoque
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
—0–100 km/h10,8 s
175 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
160 HPPower150 HP
385 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
5362 mmLength4355 mm
1860 mmWidth1965 mm
1815 mmHeight1635 mm
1883 KgWeight1700 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Ranger and 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…