DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Tourneo Custom vs 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tourneo Custom

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLand Rover
Tourneo CustomModelRange Rover Evoque
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSUV
8/9Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
157 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
155 HPPower150 HP
385 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/65 R15; 215/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4972 mmLength4355 mm
1986 mmWidth1965 mm
1827-1984 mmHeight1635 mm
2104 KgWeight1700 Kg
2933 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Tourneo Custom and 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tourneo Custom leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…