E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 AC Aceca vs 1999 BMW M3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW M3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–83.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AC AcecaSpecificationBMW M3
ACMakeBMW
AcecaModelM3
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

AC AcecaSpecificationBMW M3
5,6 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3506 ccEngine displacement3201 cc
354 HPPower321 HP
407 NmTorque350 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

AC AcecaSpecificationBMW M3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank62 lt
20 ltUrban consumption17,0 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

AC AcecaSpecificationBMW M3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/45 R18Tyre size225/45 R17; 245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

AC AcecaSpecificationBMW M3
4660 mmLength4433 mm
1890 mmWidth1710 mm
1340 mmHeight1340 mm
1615 KgWeight1560 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 AC Aceca and 1999 BMW M3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW M3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVS2000 AC AcecaAC ACE vs AC Aceca1999 and 2000 model years1999 AC AcecaVS2000 AC AcecaAC Aceca vs AC Aceca1999 and 2000 model years1999 BMW Z3VS2000 AC AcecaBMW Z3 vs AC Aceca1999 and 2000 model years1999 BMW M3VS2000 AC AcecaBMW M3 vs AC Aceca1999 and 2000 model years1998 Daimler DaimlerVS2000 AC AcecaDaimler Daimler vs AC Aceca1998 and 2000 model years

Comments are loading…