DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 BMW Z3 vs 2000 AC Aceca Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationAC Aceca
BMWMakeAC
Z3ModelAceca
1999Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors3

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationAC Aceca
5,3 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3246 ccEngine displacement3506 cc
325 HPPower354 HP
350 NmTorque407 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationAC Aceca
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank90 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption20 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationAC Aceca
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/45 R17Tyre size255/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationAC Aceca
4025 mmLength4660 mm
1740 mmWidth1890 mm
1268 mmHeight1340 mm
1450 KgWeight1615 Kg
2459 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 BMW Z3 and 2000 AC Aceca approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…