E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 BMW M3 vs 2000 AC Aceca Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW M3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW M3SpecificationAC Aceca
BMWMakeAC
M3ModelAceca
1999Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors3

Performance

BMW M3SpecificationAC Aceca
5,6 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3201 ccEngine displacement3506 cc
321 HPPower354 HP
350 NmTorque407 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

BMW M3SpecificationAC Aceca
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank90 lt
17,0 ltUrban consumption20 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW M3SpecificationAC Aceca
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17; 245/40 R17Tyre size255/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW M3SpecificationAC Aceca
4433 mmLength4660 mm
1710 mmWidth1890 mm
1340 mmHeight1340 mm
1560 KgWeight1615 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 BMW M3 and 2000 AC Aceca approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW M3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1999 Wiesmann RoadsterVS1999 BMW M3Wiesmann Roadster vs BMW M31999 and 1999 model years2000 BMW Z3VS1999 BMW M3BMW Z3 vs BMW M32000 and 1999 model years2000 BMW M3VS1999 BMW M3BMW M3 vs BMW M32000 and 1999 model years2000 Toyota SupraVS1999 BMW M3Toyota Supra vs BMW M32000 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVS1999 BMW M3AC ACE vs BMW M32000 and 1999 model years

Comments are loading…