DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi A3 vs 1996 Mazda Bongo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Bongo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

63.5–63.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationMazda Bongo
AudiMakeMazda
A3ModelBongo
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats—
3Doors4

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationMazda Bongo
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
173 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationMazda Bongo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationMazda Bongo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R15; 215/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationMazda Bongo
4152 mmLength4585 mm
1735 mmWidth1690 mm
1427 mmHeight1960 mm
1140 KgWeight—
2513 mmWheelbase2920 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi A3 and 1996 Mazda Bongo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Bongo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…