1996 • Mitsubishi
FTO
Mitsubishi FTO 1.8 i 16V GS (126 Hp) 1996Overall Score64.5/100
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mitsubishi

1996 • Audi
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
1996 Mitsubishi FTO and 1996 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableVolkswagen Passat vs Mitsubishi FTO1996 and 1996 model years
VSImage unavailableAudi A3 vs Mitsubishi FTO1996 and 1996 model years
VSImage unavailableMazda Bongo vs Mitsubishi FTO1996 and 1996 model years
VSImage unavailableBMW Z3 vs Mitsubishi FTO1996 and 1996 model years
VSImage unavailableDodge Neon vs Mitsubishi FTO1996 and 1996 model yearsComments are loading…