1996 • Mazda
Bongo
Mazda Bongo 2.5 D (120 Hp) 1996Overall Score63.75/100
1996 Mazda Bongo vs 1996 Audi A3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 1.8 20V (125 Hp) 1996Overall Score63.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Bongo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
63.75–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda BongoSpecificationAudi A3
MazdaMakeAudi
BongoModelA3
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Mazda BongoSpecificationAudi A3
—0–100 km/h9,7 s
0 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
310 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda BongoSpecificationAudi A3
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda BongoSpecificationAudi A3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/70 R15; 215/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda BongoSpecificationAudi A3
4585 mmLength4152 mm
1690 mmWidth1735 mm
1960 mmHeight1427 mm
—Weight1140 Kg
2920 mmWheelbase2513 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Bongo and 1996 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Bongo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…