DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 323 vs 1996 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi A3
MazdaMakeAudi
323ModelA3
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi A3
—0–100 km/h9,7 s
200 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
115 HPPower125 HP
157 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
8 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi A3
4035 mmLength4152 mm
1710 mmWidth1735 mm
1405 mmHeight1427 mm
1110 KgWeight1140 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 323 and 1996 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…