DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi A3 vs 1996 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationMazda 323
AudiMakeMazda
A3Model323
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationMazda 323
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
125 HPPower115 HP
173 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationMazda 323
4152 mmLength4035 mm
1735 mmWidth1710 mm
1427 mmHeight1405 mm
1140 KgWeight1110 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi A3 and 1996 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…