DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Retona vs 2000 Volkswagen Golf Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolkswagen
RetonaModelGolf
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

20,5 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
120 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
87 HPPower75 HP
200 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption11 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4000 mmLength4081 mm
1745 mmWidth1695 mm
1835 mmHeight1425 mm
1505 KgWeight1155 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Retona and 2000 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…