2000 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.9 TD 75 S (182.AF) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
2000 Fiat Bravo vs 2000 Kia Retona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.5/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationKia Retona
FiatMakeKia
BravoModelRetona
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationKia Retona
15,1 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
165 km/hTop speed120 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
75 HPPower87 HP
147 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationKia Retona
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationKia Retona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/65R14Tyre size215/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationKia Retona
4025 mmLength4000 mm
1755 mmWidth1745 mm
1420 mmHeight1835 mm
1120 KgWeight1505 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Fiat Bravo and 2000 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…