DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2000 Kia Retona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeKia
LancerModelRetona
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

16,2 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
155 km/hTop speed120 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
68 HPPower87 HP
123 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4000 mm
1690 mmWidth1745 mm
1470 mmHeight1835 mm
1128 KgWeight1505 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2000 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…