2000 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.5/100
2000 Kia Retona vs 2000 Suzuki Vitara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Suzuki
Vitara
Suzuki Vitara 1.9 TDI (3 dr) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia RetonaSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
KiaMakeSuzuki
RetonaModelVitara
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Kia RetonaSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
20,5 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
120 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
87 HPPower75 HP
200 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia RetonaSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia RetonaSpecificationSuzuki Vitara
4000 mmLength3650 mm
1745 mmWidth1630 mm
1835 mmHeight1665 mm
1505 KgWeight1230 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Retona and 2000 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…