DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Retona vs 2000 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeSkoda
RetonaModelFabia
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

20,5 s0–100 km/h18,0 s
120 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
87 HPPower64 HP
200 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4000 mmLength3960 mm
1745 mmWidth1645 mm
1835 mmHeight1450 mm
1505 KgWeight1125 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Retona and 2000 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…