DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Retona vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeRenault
RetonaModelScenic
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

20,5 s0–100 km/h18,9 s
120 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
87 HPPower64 HP
200 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4000 mmLength4168 mm
1745 mmWidth1719 mm
1835 mmHeight1609 mm
1505 KgWeight1275 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Retona and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…