2000 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.5/100
2000 Kia Retona vs 2000 Nissan Serena Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Serena
Nissan Serena 1.6 16V (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia RetonaSpecificationNissan Serena
KiaMakeNissan
RetonaModelSerena
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
3Doors4
Performance
Kia RetonaSpecificationNissan Serena
20,5 s0–100 km/h17,9 s
120 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
87 HPPower97 HP
200 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia RetonaSpecificationNissan Serena
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia RetonaSpecificationNissan Serena
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia RetonaSpecificationNissan Serena
4000 mmLength4315 mm
1745 mmWidth1710 mm
1835 mmHeight1840 mm
1505 KgWeight1396 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Retona and 2000 Nissan Serena approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…