2000 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.5/100
2000 Kia Retona vs 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 D (68 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia RetonaSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
KiaMakeMitsubishi
RetonaModelLancer
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Kia RetonaSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
20,5 s0–100 km/h16,2 s
120 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
87 HPPower68 HP
200 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia RetonaSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia RetonaSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia RetonaSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4000 mmLength4275 mm
1745 mmWidth1690 mm
1835 mmHeight1470 mm
1505 KgWeight1128 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Retona and 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…