2000 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.5/100
2000 Kia Retona vs 2000 Fiat Bravo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.9 TD 75 S (182.AF) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia RetonaSpecificationFiat Bravo
KiaMakeFiat
RetonaModelBravo
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Kia RetonaSpecificationFiat Bravo
20,5 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
120 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
87 HPPower75 HP
200 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia RetonaSpecificationFiat Bravo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia RetonaSpecificationFiat Bravo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size175/65R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Kia RetonaSpecificationFiat Bravo
4000 mmLength4025 mm
1745 mmWidth1755 mm
1835 mmHeight1420 mm
1505 KgWeight1120 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Retona and 2000 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…