DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Kia Optima vs 2016 Opel Zafira Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Zafira

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeOpel
OptimaModelZafira
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
141 HPPower150 HP
340 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol / CNG
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7 DCTGears6
215/60 R16 95V; 215/55 R17 94W; 235/45 ZR18 98YTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4855 mmLength4656 mm
1860 mmWidth1884 mm
1470 mmHeight1685 mm
1560-1695 KgWeight—
2805 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Kia Optima and 2016 Opel Zafira approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Zafira leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…