DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chevrolet Trax vs 2016 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trax

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeKia
TraxModelOptima
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
186 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1685 cc
130 HPPower141 HP
300 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank70 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7 DCT
—Tyre size215/60 R16 95V; 215/55 R17 94W; 235/45 ZR18 98Y
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4248 mmLength4855 mm
1776 mmWidth1860 mm
1674 mmHeight1470 mm
1384 KgWeight1560-1695 Kg
2555 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chevrolet Trax and 2016 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trax leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…