DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Kia Cerato vs 2016 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

66.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeKia
CeratoModelOptima
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1591 ccEngine displacement1685 cc
130 HPPower141 HP
157 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,0 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7 DCT
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size215/60 R16 95V; 215/55 R17 94W; 235/45 ZR18 98Y
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4560 mmLength4855 mm
1780 mmWidth1860 mm
1445 mmHeight1470 mm
1178 kgWeight1560-1695 Kg
482 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2805 mm

Additional Features

Kia CeratoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth
Kia Optima

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Kia Cerato and 2016 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…