DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Meriva vs 2016 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Meriva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeKia
MerivaModelOptima
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
197 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1685 cc
135 HPPower141 HP
320 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
54 ltFuel tank70 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7 DCT
—Tyre size215/60 R16 95V; 215/55 R17 94W; 235/45 ZR18 98Y
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4300 mmLength4855 mm
1912 mmWidth1860 mm
1615 mmHeight1470 mm
—Weight1560-1695 Kg
2644 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Meriva and 2016 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Meriva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…