2016 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 1.7 CRDI (141 Hp) 2016Overall Score66.75/100
2016 Kia Optima vs 2016 Chevrolet Trax Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Chevrolet
Trax
Chevrolet Trax 1.7D (130 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Trax
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Trax
KiaMakeChevrolet
OptimaModelTrax
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Trax
11,1 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
200 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
141 HPPower130 HP
340 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Trax
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank52 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Trax
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7 DCTGears6
215/60 R16 95V; 215/55 R17 94W; 235/45 ZR18 98YTyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationChevrolet Trax
4855 mmLength4248 mm
1860 mmWidth1776 mm
1470 mmHeight1674 mm
1560-1695 KgWeight1384 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2555 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Kia Optima and 2016 Chevrolet Trax approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Trax leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…