DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Kia Cadenza vs 2014 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolvo
CadenzaModelXC60
2015Model year2014
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,9 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3342 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
297 HPPower304 HP
346 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption15,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/40 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4965 mmLength4644 mm
1850 mmWidth1891 mm
1475 mmHeight1713 mm
1717 KgWeight1835 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Kia Cadenza and 2014 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…