DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volvo XC70 vs 2015 Kia Cadenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeKia
XC70ModelCadenza
2014Model year2015
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement3342 cc
304 HPPower297 HP
440 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size245/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength4965 mm
1876 mmWidth1850 mm
1604 mmHeight1475 mm
1940 KgWeight1717 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volvo XC70 and 2015 Kia Cadenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…