DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Explorer vs 2015 Kia Cadenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.5–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeKia
ExplorerModelCadenza
2016Model year2015
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3342 cc
340 HPPower297 HP
485 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 SelectShiftGears6
255/50 R20Tyre size245/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5019 mmLength4965 mm
1988 mmWidth1850 mm
1788 mmHeight1475 mm
—Weight1717 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Explorer and 2015 Kia Cadenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…