2014 • Ford
Flex
Ford Flex 3.5 V6 (364 Hp) 2014Overall Score81.75/100
2014 Ford Flex vs 2015 Kia Cadenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Kia
Cadenza
Kia Cadenza 3.3 GDI V6 (297 Hp) 2015Overall Score80.75/100
WINNER
Ford Flex
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FlexSpecificationKia Cadenza
FordMakeKia
FlexModelCadenza
2014Model year2015
SUVBody typeSedan
6-7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford FlexSpecificationKia Cadenza
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3342 cc
364 HPPower297 HP
475 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FlexSpecificationKia Cadenza
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FlexSpecificationKia Cadenza
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/60 R17Tyre size245/40 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FlexSpecificationKia Cadenza
5130 mmLength4965 mm
1930 mmWidth1850 mm
1727 mmHeight1475 mm
—Weight1717 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2845 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Ford Flex and 2015 Kia Cadenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…