DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Jeep Commander vs 2011 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMazda
CommanderModelCX-9
2010Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3701 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
213 HPPower273 HP
319 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank76 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/65 R17Tyre size245/60 R18; 245/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength5085-5100 mm
1900 mmWidth1935 mm
1826 mmHeight1727 mm
2080 KgWeight1964 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Jeep Commander and 2011 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…