DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Honda Pilot vs 2010 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeJeep
PilotModelCommander
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3471 ccEngine displacement3701 cc
257 HPPower213 HP
347 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank78 lt
16,3 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/65 R17Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4870 mmLength4787 mm
1995 mmWidth1900 mm
1845 mmHeight1826 mm
2062 KgWeight2080 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Honda Pilot and 2010 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…