DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda Tribute vs 2010 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeJeep
TributeModelCommander
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3719 ccEngine displacement3701 cc
273 HPPower213 HP
270 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/70 R16 105 STyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4787 mm
1825 mmWidth1900 mm
1765 mmHeight1826 mm
1590 KgWeight2080 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda Tribute and 2010 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…