DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Kia Carnival vs 2010 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeJeep
CarnivalModelCommander
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3778 ccEngine displacement3701 cc
254 HPPower213 HP
343 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank78 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R16Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4810 mmLength4787 mm
1985 mmWidth1900 mm
1750 mmHeight1826 mm
1990 KgWeight2080 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Kia Carnival and 2010 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…