DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Jeep Commander vs 2011 Acura TL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeAcura
CommanderModelTL
2010Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3701 ccEngine displacement3500 cc
213 HPPower280 HP
319 NmTorque254 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank0 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
245/65 R17Tyre sizeP245/50 R17 98V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength4928 mm
1900 mmWidth1880 mm
1826 mmHeight1452 mm
2080 KgWeight1690 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2775 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Jeep Commander and 2011 Acura TL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…