DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Jeep Commander vs 2010 Kia Carnival Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeKia
CommanderModelCarnival
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3701 ccEngine displacement3778 cc
213 HPPower254 HP
319 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/65 R17Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength4810 mm
1900 mmWidth1985 mm
1826 mmHeight1750 mm
2080 KgWeight1990 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Jeep Commander and 2010 Kia Carnival approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…