DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Jeep Commander vs 2010 Honda Pilot Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeHonda
CommanderModelPilot
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3701 ccEngine displacement3471 cc
213 HPPower257 HP
319 NmTorque347 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank79 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption16,3 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,2 lt
—Average consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/65 R17Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength4870 mm
1900 mmWidth1995 mm
1826 mmHeight1845 mm
2080 KgWeight2062 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Jeep Commander and 2010 Honda Pilot approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…