DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XF vs 2014 Toyota GT 86 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeToyota
XFModelGT 86
2012Model year2014
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
241 km/hTop speed226 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
240 HPPower200 HP
340 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
—TransmissionAT
—Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4961 mmLength4240 mm
1939 mmWidth1775 mm
1468 mmHeight1285 mm
1660 KgWeight1287 kg
—Luggage capacity218 lt
2909 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Jaguar XF

No additional feature records are available.

Toyota GT 86Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsLight SensorFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XF and 2014 Toyota GT 86 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…