2015 • Skoda
Octavia
Skoda Octavia 2.0 TSI (230 Hp) 2015Overall Score79.5/100
2015 Skoda Octavia vs 2012 Jaguar XF Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Jaguar
XF
Jaguar XF 2.0 (240 Hp) 2012Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Skoda Octavia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationJaguar XF
SkodaMakeJaguar
OctaviaModelXF
2015Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationJaguar XF
6,7 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
250 km/hTop speed241 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
230 HPPower240 HP
350 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationJaguar XF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Skoda OctaviaSpecificationJaguar XF
4685 mmLength4961 mm
1814 mmWidth1939 mm
1449 mmHeight1468 mm
1370 KgWeight1660 Kg
2680 mmWheelbase2909 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Skoda Octavia and 2012 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Octavia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…