DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volkswagen Scirocco vs 2012 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeJaguar
SciroccoModelXF
2014Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
233 km/hTop speed241 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
211 HPPower240 HP
280 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
DSGTransmission—
17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4256 mmLength4961 mm
1810 mmWidth1939 mm
1404 mmHeight1468 mm
1393 kgWeight1660 Kg
292 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2909 mm

Additional Features

Volkswagen SciroccoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistAuto HoldTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing Camera
Jaguar XF

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volkswagen Scirocco and 2012 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…