DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Toyota GT 86 vs 2012 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeJaguar
GT 86ModelXF
2014Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
226 km/hTop speed241 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
200 HPPower240 HP
205 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
ATTransmission—
17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4240 mmLength4961 mm
1775 mmWidth1939 mm
1285 mmHeight1468 mm
1287 kgWeight1660 Kg
218 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2909 mm

Additional Features

Toyota GT 86Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsLight SensorFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsUSB PortBluetooth
Jaguar XF

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Toyota GT 86 and 2012 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…