2003 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.7 V8 (340 Hp) 2003Overall Score78.75/100
2003 Holden UTE vs 2005 Saab 9-7X Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Saab
9-7X
Saab 9-7X 5.3 i V8 (304 Hp) 2005Overall Score79.5/100
WINNER
Saab 9-7X
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationSaab 9-7X
HoldenMakeSaab
UTEModel9-7X
2003Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationSaab 9-7X
—0–100 km/h7,5 s
0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5327 cc
340 HPPower304 HP
470 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Holden UTESpecificationSaab 9-7X
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank83 lt
—Urban consumption15,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationSaab 9-7X
5052 mmLength4922 mm
1844 mmWidth1915 mm
1476 mmHeight1791 mm
—Weight2165 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2870 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Holden UTE and 2005 Saab 9-7X approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-7X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableHummer H2 vs Holden UTE2003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableInfiniti QX56 vs Holden UTE2005 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableNissan Armada vs Holden UTE2005 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableGMC Yukon vs Holden UTE2005 and 2003 model yearsVSImage unavailableSaab 9-7X vs Holden UTE2005 and 2003 model yearsComments are loading…