DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Hummer H2 vs 2003 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden UTE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Hummer H2SpecificationHolden UTE
HummerMakeHolden
H2ModelUTE
2003Model year2003
Off-road araç, SUVBody typePick-up
4Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Hummer H2SpecificationHolden UTE
11,0 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
321 HPPower340 HP
488 NmTorque470 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Hummer H2SpecificationHolden UTE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
121 ltFuel tank0 lt
25 ltUrban consumption—
12 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Hummer H2SpecificationHolden UTE
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
315/70 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Hummer H2SpecificationHolden UTE
4820 mmLength5052 mm
2063 mmWidth1844 mm
2080 mmHeight1476 mm
2901 KgWeight—
3118 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Hummer H2 and 2003 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…