DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-7X vs 2003 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-7X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-7XSpecificationHolden UTE
SaabMakeHolden
9-7XModelUTE
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Saab 9-7XSpecificationHolden UTE
7,5 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5327 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
304 HPPower340 HP
447 NmTorque470 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-7XSpecificationHolden UTE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank0 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption—
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-7XSpecificationHolden UTE
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
255/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-7XSpecificationHolden UTE
4922 mmLength5052 mm
1915 mmWidth1844 mm
1791 mmHeight1476 mm
2165 KgWeight—
2870 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-7X and 2003 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-7X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…