DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 GMC Yukon vs 2003 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
GMCMakeHolden
YukonModelUTE
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
9Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
8,8 s0–100 km/h—
156 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
324 HPPower340 HP
502 NmTorque470 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
123 ltFuel tank0 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
245/75 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GMC YukonSpecificationHolden UTE
5570 mmLength5052 mm
2002 mmWidth1844 mm
1923 mmHeight1476 mm
2310 KgWeight—
3302 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 GMC Yukon and 2003 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…